aop的概念
aop：aspect-oriented programming（面向切面编程），维基百科的解释如下：aspect是一种新的模块化机制，用来描述分散在对象、类或者函数中的横切关注点，从关注点中分离出横切关注点是面向切面的程序设计的核心概念。分离关注点使解决特定领域问题的代码从业务逻辑中独立出来，业务逻辑的代码中不在含有针对特定领域问题的代码的调用，业务逻辑同特定领域问题的关系通过切面来封装、维护，这样原本分散在整个应用程序中的变动就可以很好地管理起来。从aop的角度，应用可以分为横切关注点和业务逻辑代码，实际开发中，这些横切关注点往往会直接嵌入到业务逻辑代码中，面向切面编程就是要解决把横切关注点与业务逻辑相分离
实现方式：
spring默认使用 jdk 动态代理作为aop的代理，缺陷是目标类的类必须实现接口，否则不能使用jdk动态代理。如果需要代理的是类而不是接口，那么spring会默认使用cglib代理，关于两者的区别：jdk动态代理是通过java的反射机制来实现的,目标类必须要实现接口，cglib是针对类来实现代理的，他的原理是动态的为指定的目标类生成一个子类，并覆盖其中方法实现增强，但因为采用的是继承，所以不能对final修饰的类进行代理。
jdk动态代理
jdk动态代理是在程序运行过程中，根据目标类实现的接口来动态生成代理类的class文件,使用主要涉及两个类：
invocationhandler接口： 它提供了一个invoke(object obj,method method, object[] args)方法供实现者提供相应的代理逻辑的实现。可以对实际的实现进行一些特殊的处理其中参数
object obj ：被代理的目标类
method method： 需要执行的目标类的方法
object[] args ：目标方法的参数
proxy类：提供一个方法newproxyinstance (classloader loader, class[] interfaces, invocationhandler h)来获得动态代理类
示例代码：
我要评论
public interface orderservice {
public void createorder();
}
public class orderserviceimpl implements orderservice {
@override
public void createorder() {
system.out.println("creating order");
}
}
public class orderlogger {
public void beforecreateorder(){
system.out.println("before create order");
}
public void aftercreateorder(){
system.out.println("after create order");
}
}
package com.sl.aop;
import java.lang.reflect.invocationhandler;
import java.lang.reflect.method;
import java.lang.reflect.proxy;
public class serviceproxy implements invocationhandler {
private object targetclass;
private orderlogger orderlogger;
public serviceproxy(object targetclass,orderlogger orderlogger) {
this.targetclass = targetclass;
this.orderlogger = orderlogger;
}
//获取代理
public object getdynamicproxy()
{
return proxy.newproxyinstance(targetclass.getclass().getclassloader(), //通过这个classloader生成代理对象
targetclass.getclass().getinterfaces(),//代理类已实现的接口
this); //动态代理调用方法是关联的invocationhandler,最终通过此invocationhandler的invoke方法执行真正的方法
}
//实现相应的代理逻辑
@override
public object invoke(object proxy, method method, object[] args) throws throwable {
this.orderlogger.beforecreateorder();
object result= method.invoke(targetclass, args);
this.orderlogger.aftercreateorder();
return result;
}
}
测试类：
package com.sl.aop;
import org.junit.test;
public class aoptest {
@test
public void testdynamicproxy() {
orderserviceimpl serviceimpl = new orderserviceimpl();
orderlogger logger = new orderlogger();
orderservice service = (orderservice) new serviceproxy(serviceimpl, logger).getdynamicproxy();
service.createorder();
}
}
运行结果：
到这个其实还是有点困惑，proxy.newproxyinstance（）这个返回的是什么？ invoke方法在哪里调用的？我们看一下jdk源码：看看dk动态代理的过程是什么样的：
根据源码内部的函数调用proxy.newproxyinstance()->proxy.getproxyclass0()->weakcache.get() ，先定位到
weakcache.class:
public v get(k key, p parameter) {
objects.requirenonnull(parameter);
expungestaleentries();
object cachekey = cachekey.valueof(key, refqueue);
// lazily install the 2nd level valuesmap for the particular cachekey
concurrentmap<object, supplier<v>> valuesmap = map.get(cachekey);
if (valuesmap == null) {
concurrentmap<object, supplier<v>> oldvaluesmap
= map.putifabsent(cachekey,
valuesmap = new concurrenthashmap<>());
if (oldvaluesmap != null) {
valuesmap = oldvaluesmap;
}
}
// create subkey and retrieve the possible supplier<v> stored by that
// subkey from valuesmap
object subkey = objects.requirenonnull(subkeyfactory.apply(key, parameter));
supplier<v> supplier = valuesmap.get(subkey);
factory factory = null;
while (true) {
if (supplier != null) {
// supplier might be a factory or a cachevalue<v> instance
v value = supplier.get();
if (value != null) {
return value;
}
}
// else no supplier in cache
// or a supplier that returned null (could be a cleared cachevalue
// or a factory that wasn't successful in installing the cachevalue)
// lazily construct a factory
if (factory == null) {
factory = new factory(key, parameter, subkey, valuesmap);
}
if (supplier == null) {
supplier = valuesmap.putifabsent(subkey, factory);
if (supplier == null) {
// successfully installed factory
supplier = factory;
}
// else retry with winning supplier
} else {
if (valuesmap.replace(subkey, supplier, factory)) {
// successfully replaced
// cleared cacheentry / unsuccessful factory
// with our factory
supplier = factory;
} else {
// retry with current supplier
supplier = valuesmap.get(subkey);
}
}
}
}
可以看到函数return value; 而 v value = supplier.get(); 继续往下读可以发现 supper=factory,实际上是一个factory对象,那么继续查看factory.get()方法
public synchronized v get() { // serialize access
// re-check
supplier<v> supplier = valuesmap.get(subkey);
if (supplier != this) {
// something changed while we were waiting:
// might be that we were replaced by a cachevalue
// or were removed because of failure ->
// return null to signal weakcache.get() to retry
// the loop
return null;
}
// else still us (supplier == this)
// create new value
v value = null;
try {
value = objects.requirenonnull(valuefactory.apply(key, parameter));
} finally {
if (value == null) { // remove us on failure
valuesmap.remove(subkey, this);
}
}
// the only path to reach here is with non-null value
assert value != null;
// wrap value with cachevalue (weakreference)
cachevalue<v> cachevalue = new cachevalue<>(value);
// try replacing us with cachevalue (this should always succeed)
if (valuesmap.replace(subkey, this, cachevalue)) {
// put also in reversemap
reversemap.put(cachevalue, boolean.true);
} else {
throw new assertionerror("should not reach here");
}
// successfully replaced us with new cachevalue -> return the value
// wrapped by it
return value;
}
return value；那么直接查看赋值语句：value = objects.requirenonnull(valuefactory.apply(key, parameter));
valuefactory又什么鬼？
public weakcache(bifunction<k, p, ?> subkeyfactory,
bifunction<k, p, v> valuefactory) {
this.subkeyfactory = objects.requirenonnull(subkeyfactory);
this.valuefactory = objects.requirenonnull(valuefactory);
}
private static final weakcache<classloader, class<?>[], class<?>> proxyclasscache = new weakcache<>(new keyfactory(), new proxyclassfactory());
可以知道valuefactory是proxyclassfactory类型对象，直接查看proxyclassfactory. apply()方法
public class<?> apply(classloader loader, class<?>[] interfaces) {
map<class<?>, boolean> interfaceset = new identityhashmap<>(interfaces.length);
for (class<?> intf : interfaces) {
/*
* verify that the class loader resolves the name of this
* interface to the same class object.
*/
class<?> interfaceclass = null;
try {
interfaceclass = class.forname(intf.getname(), false, loader);
} catch (classnotfoundexception e) {
}
if (interfaceclass != intf) {
throw new illegalargumentexception(
intf + " is not visible from class loader");
}
/*
* verify that the class object actually represents an
* interface.
*/
if (!interfaceclass.isinterface()) {
throw new illegalargumentexception(
interfaceclass.getname() + " is not an interface");
}
/*
* verify that this interface is not a duplicate.
*/
if (interfaceset.put(interfaceclass, boolean.true) != null) {
throw new illegalargumentexception(
"repeated interface: " + interfaceclass.getname());
}
}
string proxypkg = null; // package to define proxy class in
int accessflags = modifier.public | modifier.final;
/*
* record the package of a non-public proxy interface so that the
* proxy class will be defined in the same package. verify that
* all non-public proxy interfaces are in the same package.
*/
for (class<?> intf : interfaces) {
int flags = intf.getmodifiers();
if (!modifier.ispublic(flags)) {
accessflags = modifier.final;
string name = intf.getname();
int n = name.lastindexof('.');
string pkg = ((n == -1) ? "" : name.substring(0, n + 1));
if (proxypkg == null) {
proxypkg = pkg;
} else if (!pkg.equals(proxypkg)) {
throw new illegalargumentexception(
"non-public interfaces from different packages");
}
}
}
if (proxypkg == null) {
// if no non-public proxy interfaces, use com.sun.proxy package
proxypkg = reflectutil.proxy_package + ".";
}
/*
* choose a name for the proxy class to generate.
*/
long num = nextuniquenumber.getandincrement();
string proxyname = proxypkg + proxyclassnameprefix + num;
/*
* generate the specified proxy class.
*/
byte[] proxyclassfile = proxygenerator.generateproxyclass(
proxyname, interfaces, accessflags);
try {
return defineclass0(loader, proxyname,
proxyclassfile, 0, proxyclassfile.length);
} catch (classformaterror e) {
/*
* a classformaterror here means that (barring bugs in the
* proxy class generation code) there was some other
* invalid aspect of the arguments supplied to the proxy
* class creation (such as virtual machine limitations
* exceeded).
*/
throw new illegalargumentexception(e.tostring());
}
}
}
直接画重点：
byte[] proxyclassfile = proxygenerator.generateproxyclass( proxyname, interfaces, accessflags); return defineclass0(loader, proxyname, proxyclassfile, 0, proxyclassfile.length);
调用proxygenerator.generateproxyclass最终动态生成一个代理类，但是似乎并未找到何处调用了invoke方法；参考csdn: 这篇文章，尝试将这个动态生成的二进制字节码输出到本地，并反编译出来一看究竟，测试代码如下：
public class aoptest {
@test
public void testdynamicproxy() {
orderserviceimpl serviceimpl = new orderserviceimpl();
orderlogger logger = new orderlogger();
orderservice service = (orderservice) new serviceproxy(serviceimpl, logger).getdynamicproxy();
service.createorder();
//输出动态代理类字节码
createproxyclassfile();
}
private static void createproxyclassfile(){
string name = "proxyobject";
byte[] data = proxygenerator.generateproxyclass(name,new class[]{orderservice.class});
fileoutputstream out =null;
try {
out = new fileoutputstream(name+".class");
system.out.println((new file("hello")).getabsolutepath());
out.write(data);
} catch (filenotfoundexception e) {
e.printstacktrace();
} catch (ioexception e) {
e.printstacktrace();
}finally {
if(null!=out) try {
out.close();
} catch (ioexception e) {
e.printstacktrace();
}
}
}
}
使用java decompiler工具将这个二进制class文件反编译查看：
具体动态代理类proxyobject.java：
import com.sl.aop.orderservice;
import java.lang.reflect.invocationhandler;
import java.lang.reflect.method;
import java.lang.reflect.proxy;
import java.lang.reflect.undeclaredthrowableexception;
public final class proxyobject
extends proxy
implements orderservice
{
private static method m1;
private static method m2;
private static method m3;
private static method m0;
public proxyobject(invocationhandler paraminvocationhandler)
{
super(paraminvocationhandler);
}
public final boolean equals(object paramobject)
{
try
{
return ((boolean)this.h.invoke(this, m1, new object[] { paramobject })).booleanvalue();
}
catch (error|runtimeexception localerror)
{
throw localerror;
}
catch (throwable localthrowable)
{
throw new undeclaredthrowableexception(localthrowable);
}
}
public final string tostring()
{
try
{
return (string)this.h.invoke(this, m2, null);
}
catch (error|runtimeexception localerror)
{
throw localerror;
}
catch (throwable localthrowable)
{
throw new undeclaredthrowableexception(localthrowable);
}
}
public final void createorder()
{
try
{
this.h.invoke(this, m3, null);
return;
}
catch (error|runtimeexception localerror)
{
throw localerror;
}
catch (throwable localthrowable)
{
throw new undeclaredthrowableexception(localthrowable);
}
}
public final int hashcode()
{
try
{
return ((integer)this.h.invoke(this, m0, null)).intvalue();
}
catch (error|runtimeexception localerror)
{
throw localerror;
}
catch (throwable localthrowable)
{
throw new undeclaredthrowableexception(localthrowable);
}
}
static
{
try
{
m1 = class.forname("java.lang.object").getmethod("equals", new class[] { class.forname("java.lang.object") });
m2 = class.forname("java.lang.object").getmethod("tostring", new class[0]);
m3 = class.forname("com.sl.aop.orderservice").getmethod("createorder", new class[0]);
m0 = class.forname("java.lang.object").getmethod("hashcode", new class[0]);
return;
}
catch (nosuchmethodexception localnosuchmethodexception)
{
throw new nosuchmethoderror(localnosuchmethodexception.getmessage());
}
catch (classnotfoundexception localclassnotfoundexception)
{
throw new noclassdeffounderror(localclassnotfoundexception.getmessage());
}
}
终于看到关于invoke的部分了：
public final void createorder()
{
try
{
this.h.invoke(this, m3, null);
return;
}
catch (error|runtimeexception localerror)
{
throw localerror;
}
catch (throwable localthrowable)
{
throw new undeclaredthrowableexception(localthrowable);
}
}
实际上动态代理类继承自proxy，并且实现了目标类继承的接口，在createorder方法中调用了invoke方法，实现了切面逻辑的植入，这里也回答了一个问题，为什么jdk动态代理的目标类必须是实现接口的，因为代理类其实是针对接口代理，而不是针对类来代理的，动态代理类自己继承自proxy,java也不允许多重继承。动态代理类和目标类其实是各自实现了接口，代理类通过invocationhandler.invoke实现对目标类方法的调用。
cglib动态代理
cglib代理是通过使用一个字节码处理框架asm，来转换字节码并生成新的类，并在子类中采用方法拦截的技术拦截所有父类方法的调用，实现织如如横切逻辑 ，效率上比使用反射技术的jdk动态代理要高，但是由于cglib的原理是动态为目标类生成子类代理类，所以不能为声明为final的方法进行代理。其使用主要涉及两个类：
methodinterceptor接口：该接口提供一个方法intercept(object arg0, method arg1, object[] arg2, methodproxy arg3)主要用于拦截目标类方法的调用
object arg0, ：被代理的目标类
method arg1, 委托方法
object[] arg2, 方法参数
methodproxy arg3 ：代理方法的methodproxy对象
enhancer类：用于创建代理类
示例：
实现methodinterceptor接口，代理类在调用方法时，cglib会回调methodinterceptor接口intercept方法，从而织入切面逻辑。
package com.sl.aop;
import java.lang.reflect.method;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.enhancer;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.methodinterceptor;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.methodproxy;
public class cglibserviceproxy implements methodinterceptor {
private object targetclass;
private orderlogger orderlogger;
public cglibserviceproxy(object targetclass,orderlogger orderlogger) {
this.targetclass = targetclass;
this.orderlogger = orderlogger;
}
/**
* 创建代理对象
*
*/
public object getinstance() {
enhancer enhancer = new enhancer();
//设置目标类（需要被代理的类）
enhancer.setsuperclass(this.targetclass.getclass());
// 回调方法
enhancer.setcallback(this);
// 创建代理对象
return enhancer.create();
}
/**
* 拦截所有目标类方法的调用
*
*/
@override
public object intercept(object arg0, method arg1, object[] arg2, methodproxy arg3) throws throwable {
orderlogger.beforecreateorder();
object o1 = arg3.invokesuper(arg0, arg2);
orderlogger.aftercreateorder();
return o1;
}
}
测试方法：
public void testdynamicproxy() {
system.setproperty(debuggingclasswriter.debug_location_property, "d:\\class");
orderserviceimpl serviceimpl = new orderserviceimpl();
orderlogger logger = new orderlogger();
cglibserviceproxy proxy = new cglibserviceproxy(serviceimpl,logger);
//通过生成子类的方式创建代理类
orderserviceimpl proxyimp = (orderserviceimpl)proxy.getinstance();
proxyimp.createorder();
}
结果：
system.setproperty(debuggingclasswriter.debug_location_property, "d:\\class");将cglib动态代理类输出到指定目录，反编译查看一下代理类真面目：
package com.sl.aop;
import com.sl.aop.orderserviceimpl;
import java.lang.reflect.method;
import org.springframework.cglib.core.reflectutils;
import org.springframework.cglib.core.signature;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.callback;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.factory;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.methodinterceptor;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.methodproxy;
public class orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4 extends orderserviceimpl implements factory {
private boolean cglib$bound;
public static object cglib$factory_data;
private static final threadlocal cglib$thread_callbacks;
private static final callback[] cglib$static_callbacks;
private methodinterceptor cglib$callback_0;
private static object cglib$callback_filter;
private static final method cglib$createorder$0$method;
private static final methodproxy cglib$createorder$0$proxy;
private static final object[] cglib$emptyargs;
private static final method cglib$equals$1$method;
private static final methodproxy cglib$equals$1$proxy;
private static final method cglib$tostring$2$method;
private static final methodproxy cglib$tostring$2$proxy;
private static final method cglib$hashcode$3$method;
private static final methodproxy cglib$hashcode$3$proxy;
private static final method cglib$clone$4$method;
private static final methodproxy cglib$clone$4$proxy;
static void cglib$statichook1() {
cglib$thread_callbacks = new threadlocal();
cglib$emptyargs = new object[0];
class var0 = class.forname("com.sl.aop.orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4");
class var1;
method[] var10000 = reflectutils.findmethods(new string[]{"equals", "(ljava/lang/object;)z", "tostring", "()ljava/lang/string;", "hashcode", "()i", "clone", "()ljava/lang/object;"}, (var1 = class.forname("java.lang.object")).getdeclaredmethods());
cglib$equals$1$method = var10000[0];
cglib$equals$1$proxy = methodproxy.create(var1, var0, "(ljava/lang/object;)z", "equals", "cglib$equals$1");
cglib$tostring$2$method = var10000[1];
cglib$tostring$2$proxy = methodproxy.create(var1, var0, "()ljava/lang/string;", "tostring", "cglib$tostring$2");
cglib$hashcode$3$method = var10000[2];
cglib$hashcode$3$proxy = methodproxy.create(var1, var0, "()i", "hashcode", "cglib$hashcode$3");
cglib$clone$4$method = var10000[3];
cglib$clone$4$proxy = methodproxy.create(var1, var0, "()ljava/lang/object;", "clone", "cglib$clone$4");
cglib$createorder$0$method = reflectutils.findmethods(new string[]{"createorder", "()v"}, (var1 = class.forname("com.sl.aop.orderserviceimpl")).getdeclaredmethods())[0];
cglib$createorder$0$proxy = methodproxy.create(var1, var0, "()v", "createorder", "cglib$createorder$0");
}
final void cglib$createorder$0() {
super.createorder();
}
public final void createorder() {
methodinterceptor var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
if(this.cglib$callback_0 == null) {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
}
if(var10000 != null) {
var10000.intercept(this, cglib$createorder$0$method, cglib$emptyargs, cglib$createorder$0$proxy);
} else {
super.createorder();
}
}
final boolean cglib$equals$1(object var1) {
return super.equals(var1);
}
public final boolean equals(object var1) {
methodinterceptor var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
if(this.cglib$callback_0 == null) {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
}
if(var10000 != null) {
object var2 = var10000.intercept(this, cglib$equals$1$method, new object[]{var1}, cglib$equals$1$proxy);
return var2 == null?false:((boolean)var2).booleanvalue();
} else {
return super.equals(var1);
}
}
final string cglib$tostring$2() {
return super.tostring();
}
public final string tostring() {
methodinterceptor var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
if(this.cglib$callback_0 == null) {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
}
return var10000 != null?(string)var10000.intercept(this, cglib$tostring$2$method, cglib$emptyargs, cglib$tostring$2$proxy):super.tostring();
}
final int cglib$hashcode$3() {
return super.hashcode();
}
public final int hashcode() {
methodinterceptor var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
if(this.cglib$callback_0 == null) {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
}
if(var10000 != null) {
object var1 = var10000.intercept(this, cglib$hashcode$3$method, cglib$emptyargs, cglib$hashcode$3$proxy);
return var1 == null?0:((number)var1).intvalue();
} else {
return super.hashcode();
}
}
final object cglib$clone$4() throws clonenotsupportedexception {
return super.clone();
}
protected final object clone() throws clonenotsupportedexception {
methodinterceptor var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
if(this.cglib$callback_0 == null) {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
}
return var10000 != null?var10000.intercept(this, cglib$clone$4$method, cglib$emptyargs, cglib$clone$4$proxy):super.clone();
}
public static methodproxy cglib$findmethodproxy(signature var0) {
string var10000 = var0.tostring();
switch(var10000.hashcode()) {
case -2138148221:
if(var10000.equals("createorder()v")) {
return cglib$createorder$0$proxy;
}
break;
case -508378822:
if(var10000.equals("clone()ljava/lang/object;")) {
return cglib$clone$4$proxy;
}
break;
case 1826985398:
if(var10000.equals("equals(ljava/lang/object;)z")) {
return cglib$equals$1$proxy;
}
break;
case 1913648695:
if(var10000.equals("tostring()ljava/lang/string;")) {
return cglib$tostring$2$proxy;
}
break;
case 1984935277:
if(var10000.equals("hashcode()i")) {
return cglib$hashcode$3$proxy;
}
}
return null;
}
public orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4() {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
}
public static void cglib$set_thread_callbacks(callback[] var0) {
cglib$thread_callbacks.set(var0);
}
public static void cglib$set_static_callbacks(callback[] var0) {
cglib$static_callbacks = var0;
}
private static final void cglib$bind_callbacks(object var0) {
orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4 var1 = (orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4)var0;
if(!var1.cglib$bound) {
var1.cglib$bound = true;
object var10000 = cglib$thread_callbacks.get();
if(var10000 == null) {
var10000 = cglib$static_callbacks;
if(cglib$static_callbacks == null) {
return;
}
}
var1.cglib$callback_0 = (methodinterceptor)((callback[])var10000)[0];
}
}
public object newinstance(callback[] var1) {
cglib$set_thread_callbacks(var1);
orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4 var10000 = new orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4();
cglib$set_thread_callbacks((callback[])null);
return var10000;
}
public object newinstance(callback var1) {
cglib$set_thread_callbacks(new callback[]{var1});
orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4 var10000 = new orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4();
cglib$set_thread_callbacks((callback[])null);
return var10000;
}
public object newinstance(class[] var1, object[] var2, callback[] var3) {
cglib$set_thread_callbacks(var3);
orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4 var10000 = new orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4;
switch(var1.length) {
case 0:
var10000.<init>();
cglib$set_thread_callbacks((callback[])null);
return var10000;
default:
throw new illegalargumentexception("constructor not found");
}
}
public callback getcallback(int var1) {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
methodinterceptor var10000;
switch(var1) {
case 0:
var10000 = this.cglib$callback_0;
break;
default:
var10000 = null;
}
return var10000;
}
public void setcallback(int var1, callback var2) {
switch(var1) {
case 0:
this.cglib$callback_0 = (methodinterceptor)var2;
default:
}
}
public callback[] getcallbacks() {
cglib$bind_callbacks(this);
return new callback[]{this.cglib$callback_0};
}
public void setcallbacks(callback[] var1) {
this.cglib$callback_0 = (methodinterceptor)var1[0];
}
static {
cglib$statichook1();
}
}
上面的代码可以看到代理类orderserviceimpl$$enhancerbycglib$$17779aa4 继承目标类orderserviceimpl并且实现了接口factory,代理类中关于createorder生成了两个方法cglib$createorder$0和createorder：
cglib$createorder$0方法内部直接调用目标类的supper.createorder
createorder方法内部首先盘点否实现了methodinterceptor接口的callback，如果存在则调用methodinterceptor接口拦截方法intercept,根据前面的实现intercept方法内部实现了对目标方法的调用object o1 = arg3.invokesuper(arg0, arg2) ，invokesuper内部实际上是直接调用的代理类的cglib$createorder$0()方法，最终调用了目标类createorder。
两种代理对比
jdk动态代理：
代理类与委托类实现同一接口，主要是通过代理类实现invocationhandler并重写invoke方法来进行动态代理的，在invoke方法中将对方法进行增强处理 优点：不需要硬编码接口，代码复用率高，缺点：只能够代理实现了接口的委托类
cglib动态代理：
代理类将委托类作为自己的父类并为其中的非final委托方法创建两个方法，一个是与委托方法签名相同的方法，它在方法中会通过super调用委托方法；另一个是代理类独有的方法。在代理方法中，它会判断是否存在实现了methodinterceptor接口的对象，若存在则将调用intercept方法对委托方法进行代理 优点：可以在运行时对类或者是接口进行增强操作，且委托类无需实现接口，缺点：不能对final类以及final方法进行代理
总结
以上就是这篇文章的全部内容了，希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作具有一定的参考学习价值，如果有疑问大家可以留言交流，谢谢大家对移动技术网的支持。
如对本文有疑问， 点击进行留言回复！！
JUC—CopyOnWriteArrayList源码深度解析
application.yml配置文件属性自动装配到实体类中各种数据类型写法
关于java对象的反序列化时产生的异常补充：java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid type code: AC
网友评论